I guess this isn't going to happen - froth T C 20:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE REFERENCE DESK
#KNOPPIX STARTUP OGG SOUNDS INSTALL#
cesarb 20:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply Then I have to install ext3 drivers for windows -_. I don't think it's possible to mount the qcow (is that what it's called?) format since it's so tightly managed by qemu - froth T C 06:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply You can use qemu-img convert to convert it to raw, and then mount it. cesarb 06:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply Not only am I not using raw, but my host OS is windows XP. Don't forget to umount before running the image again. The final command will probably be something like mount -o ro,loop,offset=32256 -t ext3 example.img /mnt. Usually the Start value is 63 (for the first partition), which means you should use -o offset=32256. The value to be given to the offset= option can be found by using /sbin/fdisk on the image, selecting expert mode, and printing the partition table multiply the value at the Start column by 512 (the sector size) to get the value to be used. Any ideas? - froth T C 05:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply The easiest way (if it's qemu's default "raw" image format) is to simply do a loopback mount of the image with the offset= option pointing to the start of the desired partition inside the image. I think it loaded the right madwifi drivers (though ping doesnt work.) however it's a nightmare to set everything up for proxy.
#KNOPPIX STARTUP OGG SOUNDS ISO#
What's the best way to do this? Is there any way to make a 100mb floppy disc image or something and mount it in ubuntu, then copy my files to it, release from ubuntu, then mount on my host OS? Or maybe a better way of doing it? Unfortunately the internet isn't exactly an option since I did a server install that didn't give me a web browser (and I don't want to download the iso again to get one). I have some files I have on ubuntu server in qemu that I'd like to get to my host OS. Consumed Crustacean ( talk) 17:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply Active Desktop No idea if the GS+ is close to XFX's GS Extreme but it's likely fairly close, so this should be a decent indication. I says that the 7800GS+ is nearly 3x as fast as the plain 6600. As for performance, you might want to check out this chart (doesn't list the 6600LE, but I'm almost certain that it's slower than the plain 6600 note too that I don't recomment Tomshardware for anything but that chart :P). Last I checked, ATI doesn't make AGP cards that are quite as good as the AGP 7800s, but have switched pretty much completely to PCI-E. However, since this card has to be AGP, nvidia is likely the best bet. Some games do indeed handle better on either ATI or nvidia cards. The chipset and the main electronics are the same, it's just the card itself and the assembly that's done differently. With XFX you may miss out all the time (or you may just get what nvidia gets since xfx uses nvidia's chipset, I'm not sure exactly how it works) - froth T C 17:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply XFX Geforce cards should just be considered nVidia cards. far cry played much better on ATI for example.
At first glance, the card seems to have good ratings.- Mitaphane talk 03:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reply Many games look better when played on ati or nvidia cards. Is this a good card? Will it performe better than my current Geforce 6600LE? IS XFX a reputable company? Thank for your help!Ĭheck out & Froogle.
Ive so far been able to pick the XFX 7800GS Extreme. I want the graphic card to be able to play most games available now.
It has to be AGP as i don't hav a PCI-E and can't afford a new motherboard.
0 kommentar(er)
